To all the liberals who believe in the “right to choose" because we can’t put someone else’s morals onto another person or ‘I’m personally pro-life but I know some people aren’t so I won’t make you live by that’, I have a little note for you. Your “live and let live" mentality doesn’t work. Your “I don’t believe that that action is moral, but I’ll let you do it because you might see it as moral" viewpoint is asinine.
This creates a world of complete acceptance, which at first sounds really nice: “You don’t agree with gay marriage? Well you don’t have to get one, so it’s all good. We aren’t gonna force you to smoke weed, but why can’t these other people smoke it if they want? Ya know what, you don’t have a uterus so you can’t have an opinion on this topic so why don’t you go ahead and not worry about abortion. You can talk it out with your partner." However, this ENTIRE community is destroyed the second a single person decides to kill someone else. You are then faced with an ultimatum: do you allow this person to continue killing because they feel it’s moral or permissible OR do you stop them and implement your first law (murder is a crime and will not be tolerated)?
If you allow the man to continue killing, he can severely harm this community by force. However if you implement a law against murder you infringe on someone’s moral viewpoint. This is a lose-lose situation for the community because you are being forced to choose the lesser of two evils.
Now let’s relate this directly to abortion:
Do we simply allow for the killing of babies because another person may not see the baby as a baby (harm an entire community) OR do we take a stand and implement a law against this killing (step on this person’s beliefs because we see it as murder)?
This creates a world of complete acceptance, which at first sounds really nice: “You don’t agree with gay marriage? Well you don’t have to get one, so it’s all good. We aren’t gonna force you to smoke weed, but why can’t these other people smoke it if they want? Ya know what, you don’t have a uterus so you can’t have an opinion on this topic so why don’t you go ahead and not worry about abortion. You can talk it out with your partner." However, this ENTIRE community is destroyed the second a single person decides to kill someone else. You are then faced with an ultimatum: do you allow this person to continue killing because they feel it’s moral or permissible OR do you stop them and implement your first law (murder is a crime and will not be tolerated)?
If you allow the man to continue killing, he can severely harm this community by force. However if you implement a law against murder you infringe on someone’s moral viewpoint. This is a lose-lose situation for the community because you are being forced to choose the lesser of two evils.
Now let’s relate this directly to abortion:
Do we simply allow for the killing of babies because another person may not see the baby as a baby (harm an entire community) OR do we take a stand and implement a law against this killing (step on this person’s beliefs because we see it as murder)?
I for one am taking a stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment